From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Wallis Simpson in 1936
| |
| Born | Bessie Wallis Warfield 19 June 1896[1] Blue Ridge Summit, Pennsylvania |
| Died | 24 April 1986 (aged 89) Bois de Boulogne, Paris |
| Occupation | Socialite |
| Title | Duchess of Windsor House of Windsor (by marriage) |
| Spouse(s) | Earl Winfield Spencer, Jr. (m. 1916; div. 1927) Ernest Aldrich Simpson (m. 1928; div. 1937) Prince Edward, Duke of Windsor (m. 1937; d. 1972) |
Wallis's father died shortly after her birth, and she and her widowed mother were partly supported by their wealthier relatives. Her first marriage, to U.S. naval officer Win Spencer, was punctuated with periods of separation and eventually ended in divorce. In 1934, during her second marriage to Ernest Simpson, she allegedly became the mistress of Edward, Prince of Wales.[2] Two years later, after Edward's accession as king, Wallis divorced her second husband in preparation to marry Edward.
The King's desire to marry a woman who had two living ex-husbands threatened to cause a constitutional crisis in the United Kingdom and the Dominions, and ultimately led to his abdication in December 1936 to marry "the woman I love".[3] After the abdication, the former king was created Duke of Windsor by his brother and successor, King George VI. Edward married Wallis six months later, after which she was formally known as the Duchess of Windsor, without the style "Her Royal Highness". She was instead styled as "Her Grace", a style normally reserved only for non-royal dukes and duchesses.
Before, during, and after World War II, the Duke and Duchess of Windsor were suspected by many in government and society of being Nazi sympathisers. In the 1950s and 1960s, she and the Duke shuttled between Europe and the United States, living a life of leisure as society celebrities. After the Duke's death in 1972, the Duchess lived in seclusion, and was rarely seen in public. Her private life has been a source of much speculation, and she remains a controversial figure in British history.
Would you abdicate for love if you were King? (100 words)
It is a very difficult question answer because love is very strong, but in these cases the Royal family has large commitments to carry out and respond, and abdicate means let everything around you and these become accustomed since childhood by starting a relationship with a new person in your life which you want and you love but don't know if in the future everything will continue as well or will end and you will regret of decision of the past, but if it is true that love is the most important world and what more happy makes someone and filling more than money and than anything else
ResponderEliminarI have never thought about this before but I think it depends on the situation and the person you are and the person you are going to marry or not. When you have to choose between a person and the power you have to be very sure about what you feel. If I were completely sure that the person that I would marry loves me and is the right person, I would abdicate. But if there were insecurity and I do not know if the person that is with me really loves me or just wants me to be rich or to be powerful, I will not abdicate.
ResponderEliminarI think that I wouldn´t abdicate if I were kind. The main reason to keep the title or the range is that I wouldn´t abdicate for love because you don´t know how is going to be , that is, may be your love going with another person and stop the relationship or maybe you won´t love him in the future and you were abdicated without reason. The thing or the behavior that you have to do is that you have to find a love in the throne because in the future, if you will stop the relationship or you will go with another person you can do it at the same time that you are in the throne. I think that abdicate is a practice that few kings do and when they do is because a reasonable thing like they aren´t prepare(there are many situations that they aren´t prepare and they are the kings because they don´t want to abdicate, for example when the king is very young or is a teenager) or abdicate because they won´t want to be a king(that is very unusual). To sum up I wouldn´t abdicate never because I prefer to be a king.
ResponderEliminarI think that I wouldn´t abdicate if I were kind. The main reason to keep the title or the range is that I wouldn´t abdicate for love because you don´t know how is going to be , that is, may be your love going with another person and stop the relationship or maybe you won´t love him in the future and you were abdicated without reason. The thing or the behavior that you have to do is that you have to find a love in the throne because in the future, if you will stop the relationship or you will go with another person you can do it at the same time that you are in the throne. I think that abdicate is a practice that few kings do and when they do is because a reasonable thing like they aren´t prepare(there are many situations that they aren´t prepare and they are the kings because they don´t want to abdicate, for example when the king is very young or is a teenager) or abdicate because they won´t want to be a king(that is very unusual). To sum up I wouldn´t abdicate never because I prefer to be a king.
ResponderEliminarFirst of all, love is not in human life. There are many people who put love before work of wealthness. They do not really know what they are doing. You can love a lot a person but it could not be on top of your job or your dairy life. Although my position is not to put love before other things, I would abdicate for love. On the one hand, if you abdicate, you will lose all the material things that being a king means. You will have to renounce to high-level management position, huge amounts of money and the stand that a king means.
ResponderEliminarOn the other hand, you can be sure you want to abdicate and stay with the woman/ man of your life. You will not care about what people say or this loving decision.
First of all, I would not like to be a King or a Queen, so probably I would abdicate any way. But, for sure, I am a very romantic person and I would like to think that I would abdicate for love. For me love is a very important reason to leave anything. When you fall in love with someone, you feel lost; you are not the owner of your actions. You feel like crazy, like able to do anything or unable to do something, like if you were a marionette and someone were moving you. So if it were necessary to abdicate to get marry with the person I have fall in love, definitively I would abdicate.
ResponderEliminarI, if the Prince Edward, and I am truly in love by simpsoms wallis if abdicate. the truth is also that first discover if she truly loves me not trust her but not for the reason that before the in his life had two relationships that had an unfortunate end without love. Moreover also I would think if you truly love I feel for her will last me for a lifetime, because if the opposite were to abdicate and then she let me roll my life would be nothing. but if I abdicate conclusion that in many ways love can me.
ResponderEliminarI hope this review by if not abdicate or Princess wallis simpson been found which you want
I believe that there are very few people in history that have abdicated by love. They strongly believed that having the power was the most important and they married for money and for convenience. If I were a king and I had to choose between power and love, I would choose love because love can make you happy.It would be a very difficult choice, nobody would aggre and my family will not accept it. However, I think money only give you money but not happiness.
ResponderEliminarLorena fusulier goyeneche 1c
Firstly, should abdicate because supposedly love left everything that happens that this is something more , something that happens to a person of normal street, so here it is difficult, I think to make that decision you have to be pretty sure that love is real and forever you will never fail, is not an easy decision to make as it is to give up a very important privilege , first I would seem a sign of love but we must also take into account risk that can run, nothing in life ensures that a fence last love and everything you let in love is nice and is fine but you have to think hard and try to make the best decision because in this life above all have to think in yourself and what is best for you.
ResponderEliminarSo I think this decision is not easy and has its good and bad parts and is a decision you have to take it slow and shuffling all things very calmly and as I said before thinking of yourself.
If I were queen….
ResponderEliminarFirst of all I have never been in that situation that means that I can not explain perfectly what I would do.
To be honest I think that if I were a queen and I fall in love of someone, to abdicate for that person I must be sure If he correspond myself or not, because if I leave everything for that person I have to know if I am going to spent the rest of my life with him or If It is going to be a mistake. It is a very big responsibility and a big deception
For love? no, never abdicate by love. I think abdicate is very strong and important in this life from self, family. Many people are driven by the strong love, so many or some other self that could give for love. I think before love, you have to look for you and your future, and abdicating that fact might have some advantages but also many disadvantages.
ResponderEliminarIf your partner dies establishing dedicido give you the love you had it, what would you? The life that would be very different to that would be if you had not abdicated, but each has a very different way of seeing and thinking that nobody will match
Well, if I were a queen I am sure that I would abdicate for love.
ResponderEliminarOn the one hand, I think that fall in love it is impossible to reject because you can't decide about your feelings. So in my opinion you are happier with the person who you love than having a life with authority.
But on the other hand it would be a difficult decission. You would lost a lot of advantages and many people would hate you. Furthermore you don't have so money than if you would continue being a queen.
To sump up, if I fall in love, I would leave everything for love.
If I were queen would have many responsibilities to fulfill because I represent my country but I think before all that entails being queen I'm a person and I think it should be free to choose who I fall in love and with whom I want to marry and have children all my life.
ResponderEliminarI think love just happens and you never know who you can love and be queen do not have to marry a king. I think it must have autonomy to decide that because you have to spend the rest of your life with that person and you have to be happy at his side.
If you were forbidden to marry a man who is not king abdicate my crown because I think love is always more important to know what you do and who you do it because clearly I would not do for anyone. That person would have to show me a lot and wants to convince me that isn’t just for me and my wealth would have to prove that is not separate from me in both good and bad moments.
That way I abdicate my throne for love because they think there is a more important in this world who feel loved and be happy with the person you love.
I personally if I were King discuss my situation. I abdicated if the love you feel for the woman is really true. We should also examine whether she actually also loves you. It is a very compromising situation to decide, but if I were King, I would check if the love that she feel by me is true and if it is worth really abdicate to a King post with love, because that would mean the loss of your empire. I really not abdicated to a post for the love of a woman. I think it would be a mistake since it would lose dignity as King.
ResponderEliminarTo make this decision must be done calmly and leading to many good things and some bad. The first thing to think about is what really is best for oneself. This requires analyzing different situations very well since it is a great privilege to have only one person can have. If you know for sure that is the person in your life there is nothing to what you can be happier how much power you have.
ResponderEliminarOn the other hand you have the privilege in that position is impossible to recover and is a pretty important position.
It is clear that being King has a very important role, but had a much more important role years ago. Born to be King is a fortune, and make the decision to leave all that your ancestors have left you is very difficult.
ResponderEliminarIf I really was in love with Wallis would leave everything I had for her.
Anyway, is not as easy as it looks abdicate and today few already do, much less love.
In closing, I would like to say that I think that love is everything, and it's worth much more than fortune. As one proverb says, is not the richest that has more, but who needs the least.
I would have to think a lot and I am more than sure it's the woman of my life but would leave or not leave the throne. is a big step and you can not take so lightly, we must meditate and talk to your parents or close relatives. I would suspect the woman at the beginning and more knowing his history, divorced twice ... something that was unthinkable in those days before what God has joined no man put asunder. donot really what I'd do.
ResponderEliminarif I'm really in love and she is also what I would leave, do not leave the throne to my country but also the country would have to understand. would not fail to take my fancy and my possessions, but would have to accept that I am no longer king.
this is my opinion, there may be people who do not agree but if you really piensop worth must fight for what you want.
Marcos Ortega Ferrusola 2ºA
If I were king, would not have to abdicate for love simply because I would be the king, therefore does what I want (in ancient times). But if the masses do not let me live in peace and my life is in danger along with my beloved, and I would go abdicate far to live a family life without many luxuries. People always pick where they call them, and that's something that bothers me. All are feelings and we should be in them, no matter who do either. All receive what we give.
ResponderEliminarI will never be King because I am a female but maybe I will became Queen. In most of the European´s countries now a women can became Queen for birth, if that should be my case I am completely sure that my answer to your question, Would you abdicate for love? my answer would be a clear yes, if I find the true love I will abdicate for sure, now most of royal marriage in Europe that I remember are between different social levels, people from the common class and the aristocracy. For example in Spain our Princess of Asturias, who will became Queen, was a divorce lady without kids, another case was that princess from Sweden who get married with her personal trainer and now they became parents. Finally with all that proofs, I would not have to abdicate to be with the person that I consider my better half.
ResponderEliminarSOFIA PUJOL CUESTA 2A
Would you abdicate for love? If i were a queen i´m sure that i won´t abdicate because of love. I always think that nobody can loves you eternally, because you can have discussions, and you dont know where are you going yo be in five years.Some partners are very happy when they gate married because they fell in blind love, but then ten years later they have a big discussion and they broke up.
ResponderEliminarThink for a moment if you are a queen, you have all your necessitys cover like, healthy, money, car, big house, and suddenly appears one man that tells you he is in blind love of you, but perhaps the man only wants you because of your moeny or because your status,or the fame...
I never broke-up my life if one man tll me he is in blind love because live gives many changes.
First of all i have to be certain to get maried with someone, first i have to be more or less 5 years meeting him so then i could get maried.
So in my conclusion if i´m a queen i wont reject my position because of love
A King is an important person that has lot of responsibilities and relevance in a society. They have to have a careful image before the people, to transmit the importance, the respect and the education that need a symbol like their.
ResponderEliminarThe king is an institution that represent the people, the history and the culture of a country, and in a democratic system, they seems under the parliament power.
As we said before, they have to conserve an image even choosing the person they want to marry and spend the rest of their lives together, so they can not choose any person not socially accepted.
Personally, I cant know what I would do in this case if I were a King, but I think if you are in love, and you cant live without that person, you should abdicate and start a new life with him or her, but if you are not convinced, you mustn’t abdicate, because the crown is your life, so it is an important decision.
Abdicate ? For love? Clearly , love is such a strong feeling that if it is true what you feel you can handle any kind of thing , whether the place you live or the crown of your country, I think that being king or queen is not all, it can give you a life full of benefits , full of money , full of good things and love but ? if not in love as you can get to be happy? It is one of the essential things in life , being in love and as much as being king or queen, if you cease to be because you guide them your heart I think it's something important because otherwise you 'd be regretting your whole life , the fact think that would have happened had abdicated ? you stay with the doubt forever and yes, you will be king and all that but the love of your life is out of this great palace and all those expensive clothes, and those feelings can not be bought with money or return or descambiar like clothes, point that feels and can not help but feel it as much as be king stop you because it really is essential to be happy and live a good life.
ResponderEliminarIt's dicifil the decision, love is as healthy and but choosing between is the most painful, is a non-stop roller coaster. Having a picture for a seat and real image you acquired some very important values that you must realizar.Por you pertener in a royal family, you have to choose the person you are going to be, but rather for economic reasons or personality. In my opinion if it could risk the consequences could be more serious, never forgetting that love is not chosen for political or economies, if not the very nature of self, without rankings without prejudice
ResponderEliminarIn my opinion, it’s difficult to talk about this topic, because it’s complicated to take place of this person. Nobody of us is going to be king or queen, so this is loose talk.
ResponderEliminarBut, what is love? Love is a huge feeling that it is said that moves mountains. It is said that love conquers all. But, how about being a king? I think this is a difficult decision.
Obviously, you are the only that can choose your live.
ON the one hand, you must choose to live with the woman you love, for the rest of your live (or not, because you also could be wrong) or on the other hand you can perform the role that has been assigned to you.
If I was in this situation, I would think in all the others factors that mean you are a king, not only thinking in love.
Ignacio Fernández García 2ºA
In my opinion love is more important in life than to be a king or prince. Many think money gives us happiness but from my point of view have love, family and good friends is most important. The expensive things, palaces, luxury cars after all are boring but loved ones are essential to happiness. If I were queen and suddenly find the person you spend the rest of my life and I had to choose abdiraría certainly be close to yours. On the other hand I think I would be queen though many good things also has drawbacks, they have to show up every day at many conferences and public events, have just intimacy. have much care for your image .... In short rather have a life full of happiness with love and affection rather than being a member of the court and regret all my life.
ResponderEliminarFirst I would try to change the laws, through lawmakers country, to marry whoever and may reign, if this could not be done, I would see if anyone can reign in my place, following the dynastic order to ensure monarchy, and once found this person: brother, sister, cousin, cousin ... yes, I would abdicate for love.
ResponderEliminarFor my abdication rate leads to the loss of the monarchy, and would not keep that person as a lover and comply with the laws in force until legally able to be replaced because of illness or other lawful reason.
Luis Venegas Perez 1ºC
ResponderEliminarWALLIS SIMPSON
It is a question some difficult because I never will be a King, but if I would have to choose I abdicate for love because the love you never know when come for you and when the love come, you reject for this?! REALLY?! I think that no. You should the think that make you more happy although this means that you have abdicate in other person for you can go with your love.
In conclusion, you should try to find your happiness, overcoat in the love.
Rosa Moreno Damas, 2ºA
ResponderEliminarBeing king or queen is a big responsibility, and it prevails over other options. Being born in a royal family and being possible successor involves many things aside, sometimes perhaps love. But love does not understand reasons, so it would have to find a middle ground. I think as I will be queen and I have power for it, I should try to change the law that prevents me to marry with the person I love. It would be the first thing I would try. In the case that doesn't allow me to change the law, I would have to think which would mean to leave the throne. The image that people would have of me would not be the most appropriate but I guess that they partly understand. So they could review me they would put themselves in my situation. Since I have no brothers or sisters, before abdicating in someone first who will oversee well leave the throne. It should be someone I trust, who knows what I would do. Although this would be a big problem to dynastic level, since the surname would change.
In conclusion; I would try to change the law to reign being married to the man I love, and case I can't, I have to find myself in the situation and think about it.
If I were king, would not Have to abdicate because if you were the king in the could old to do what you want without explanation to the people, but the people pressed me much I might please abdicate and flee with my beloved to another realm to create a family and live happily but this should be really in love because if you were the king was to have lots of money, jewelry, large palaces and give up all this for a woman should cost job but for true love would deserve it, one must make with his life what the heart tells you because otherwise you will not be happy.
ResponderEliminarThat's something you do not know until you actually are in the situation, but in my point of view I think if abdicate in love, I think it's more important to spend your life with someone you truly love and with which will enjoy many times over the years, rather than be a king or have a great fortune, that are superficial things you might like for a while but nothing is further from reality, you'd just overwhelming and tiring, plus that without someone to provide a strong support for you is dificl hold that standard of living
ResponderEliminarThe future King of a country normally undergoes a very strict education and formation since he will hold a very unique and special position. He will be the model figure of a country and will have to take difficult decisions during his life and as head figure of a country. He will have to make international relations and be responsible for maintaining them throughout his life. He will also have to travel and represent his country attending loads of meetings and receptions. For all of these activities he will definitely need a well- educated and appropriate wife to accompany him in this difficult task throughout his life as king. The ideal situation is that the future queen has also been brought up to fulfill this task. This is not so easy since the future king would have to fall in love and marry a princess from another country. Nowadays this does not often occur. Future kings normally meet and marry normal working women which they have fallen in love with. If I were king I would do so too because it is the person whom I will probably live with the rest of my life and it would not be very nice to be married with someone I do not love. As she will probably not be prepared to be queen I would help her in teaching everything she would need to know to fulfill a good task. If there is love and goodwill everything should work out well and I would be a good king as well as my wife a good queen.
ResponderEliminarJavier Bermejo 2ºA
Rosa Dominguez Bejar 2ºA
ResponderEliminarI think it's more important to be with the person you want before you leave for a throne and that you will spend the rest of your life and in the end the person you just tired throne.
Being with a person you love is very nice because you share with her many times in your life that will mark forever and if you arrive later and I casais you can have children, etc.
considering that she was divorced 2 times and at that time was frowned upon man should to think twice before abdicating in love because you can diborciarse again and would be a shame not think twice and do not talk to the family committed a mistake.
In my opinion, I would think before I do anything and then if I do well abdicated and would talk to her to be on the throne and it would happen but life with her and the children that we had.
if that were my situation I honestly do not abdicate because the king is the ultimate authority and therefore can do whatever I want and not answer to anyone. King also always tendraal army to his side and if estosn are with no one can do anything. But still is a dificl situation for the people and the leaders he would throw it up because of his attitude. In addition to this we must add the shame that the king had to feel after getting caught in this difficult situation. abdicate and shame and discomfort, but only for those two reasons, not for others.
ResponderEliminarIt is difficult to answer this question well. Women and men have different ways of thinking into what love is. Women are more emotional and express more feelings while men are usually more surly and do not express much. I've never been king and hope never to be but I think it is important enough to abdicate by love. You can have a relationship with that person without having to leave the office to another. I think this post should be taken more seriously than leave it to another for love. Surely now thinking without being King would say if you would love, but if all we thought it would honestly think quietly insane. As in reality it has never happened or at least I've never heard that social impact will not have that.
ResponderEliminarThe society waits for the kings that the king has children in order that the monarchic institution is kept in the time, I think that serious very difficult to decide because a king has a lot obligations with his country and in addition the king is prepared for it during during all his life .however every person has right to live happy and to choose his pair. that mean a big problem born between the obligations and the personal feelings of the rey.in my opinion I think that if I was a king and I never wouldn´t get marry with a person that I do not want because then the relation will finish in divorce and this also is a problem for the monarqui.a cause of this I believe that I iwill choose to get married with the person whom I love and I abdicate. But this nowadays does not happen, since nowadays almost all the royal houses agree to marry persons who are not of royal blood , But nowadays there are many divorces so is very very important choose one person very well with whom you will live during all your life .and though there are a lot of obligations in conclusion I think that i abdicate to the crown
ResponderEliminarbecause is important more to live being happy with the person that you love and can choose at liberty
If I were queen and I happened to find love and that person was not the one that the system want me to be with, I would do anything to change something, some law or regulation regarding this issue. It would be a complex question to solve though. Marrying for love is something relatively new and being a member of a royal family is a “profession”. However, this kind of things are a bit old for society now. We have made a lot of progress but we have this institution from the Middle Ages or even before, which doesn’t make much sense to me.
ResponderEliminarAnd my question is: do you prefer money or a woman? I clearly would have done the same to the king, I think a woman who are in love can fill much more than be king of a country, plus the wife will appreciate very much this decision in which you show that these fully dedicated and love with her. the history of these two men is a little weird which is what makes the British protest against the infidelity of women before her ex-husband. It's a story of movie script in which I do the following question arises : will the British people will follow satisfied after he rejected the crown or unhappy would follow ? The truth is that I can imagine the response and I hope so because someone else was in the place of the king may be seeing the woman he is in love with her and become king of a country I would do one more, instead this man prefaced his love and discontent of the people to their satisfaction and their place in the society. It really is a beautiful love story of many we should learn.
ResponderEliminarI think that being King is not something that you happiness and love of course you the da. A King can be the King who wants to but if you don't have love is would end soon in a single King bored with his life and, if a lot of money, but why? but he has no one with whom to share it or spend it. Love along with the friendship is more important I think that must have people and both are linked. You have a friend is to have love for someone just to have a couple, they are different loves but they do. It is clear that not he abdicated to a true love just as King.
ResponderEliminarIt is a particularly rare and difficult subject to find in real life. But if I put myself in that situation would think well, if I were queen and was in love with a person much ... I abdicate. Because for my forever love and happiness are above all, above money, above fame ... But if on the other hand love the other person is not as great as that of being queen would follow reign and I would ensure to be clear.
ResponderEliminarIt is very interesting that a woman has done that for love because love is now no longer so important and couples are separated and there is no respect that existed before. Very few people can talk about love sincerely.
To abdicate for love is a question difficult to answer, since these when inspired love it is what major happiness gives you but I believe that a king has many responsibilities and charges as to do something like that. A king has the right and the obligation to fulfill the laws and to fulfill the charges that it has as king. Former if they were forced to marry other persons of the royalty but already, nowadays it is not like that.
ResponderEliminarOn the one hand, I think that to marry of form forced with another person has to be horrible since you have to coexist with the above mentioned person day after day and sometimes former without not if it wants to have been known previously but I believe that it was a way of continuing with the procedure of the royalty and that the kings who were marrying were raised like such. But on the other hand, I believe that it is good that it has changed since to marry for love nice mas is but in a future to be able to be something that spoils the monarchy since those of the royalty that they marry persons who are not little by little the generations will be growing up with fewer forms and education different from the one that the future kings of a country were receiving before.
I really never be able to abdicate the throne of my country , but I think that love has great strength and can sometimes cause us to abandon our vocation , something we like to do, love. Although the throne of a country is a big responsibility and not just wear a crown as it also is to represent a people a nation and be the maximum representative to the outside, so if I agree to sacrifice things for your country but never , never the throne of a nation. Though love is something that blinds us when we cove , we can not see or do something else, something that sometimes makes us put aside our responsibilities and important elements in our lives . Therefore it is important to stop , think and act so cold but always taking into account the feelings of one. Because also if it is true that if the contract this marriage or being with this woman and to conduct a spotted relationship and we harm the image of our country as there if I would consider leaving the crown but for me to leave my country would be leaving one of my greatest loves.
ResponderEliminarFor love? no, never abdicate by love. I think abdicate is very strong and important in this life from self, family. Many people are driven by the strong love, so many or some other self that could give for love. I think before love, you have to look for you and your future, and abdicating that fact might have some advantages but also many disadvantages.
ResponderEliminarIf your partner dies establishing dedicido give you the love you had it, what would you? The life that would be very different to that would be if you had not abdicated, but each has a very different way of seeing and thinking that nobody will match
If I were king I would not abdicate for love, as a king should separate what is his personal life of his duties and obligations to the crown. By birth he has duties and enjoys privileges that other people do not have. It is true that in most of the royal houses of princes and princesses, the heirs to the throne marry normal townspeople. As has occurred in Spain. The prince married a journalist. I honestly do not think it's easy for a person who has grown up in a completely different environment can adapt smoothly to strict protocol and obligations of representation and that would cause problems sooner or later in the relationship. This person should have a vocation of service similar to politicians.
ResponderEliminarAlberto Romero Real 1 º D
ResponderEliminarI think not, because I think it can get to be King and be married to the woman you want. And if I had to abdicate to sweat with a woman that I like would not, I'd rather stay with becoming King family and find another woman that was not needed to abdicate, however much liked me he would have to abdicate . Getting a good future is more important than focusing only on love. Although everyone do whatever they want, but they think it's a good decision no return.
If I were queen….
ResponderEliminarFirst of all I have never been in that situation that means that I can not explain perfectly what I would do.To be honest I think that if I were a queen and I fall in love of someone, to abdicate for that person I must be sure If he correspond myself or not, because if I leave everything for that person I have to know if I am going to spent the rest of my life with him or If It is going to be a mistake. I think if abdicate as he did it because I would be completely in love with him, he could keep forever and live a quiet life
Ana garcia vera
I think that is more important to be with the person you want before you that leave for a throne and you'll spend the rest of his life and at the end the person just tired throne.
ResponderEliminarTo be with someone you love is very good because you are with her many times in your life that will mark forever and if you arrive late and to marry can have children, etc.
considering that she was divorced two times and then it was bad man must think twice before abdicating in love, because you can divorce again and would be a shame not think two times and do not talk to family
I think before you do something and then if I do well abdicated and talk to her to be on the throne and it would happen, but life with her and the children had.
If I was a king I do not believe that it was abdicating for love since in my opinion a king does not have many obligations and of the few ones that a king has it is to marry a person who has royal blood, though every time they are giving him more cases in that the princes marry persons who do not have royal blood since she can be the princess leticia of Spain or kate middleton of England, though these types of cases already meet accepted by the persons of the whole world. In conclusion I would not be capable of stopping being a king of a country for love
ResponderEliminarI think very few people have abdicated for love along the time. People usually prefer to have a job than to have a couple, nowadays having a job is one of the most important things, because of the actual economy.
ResponderEliminarBut it is true that when you fall in love for someone, you would leave everything for him/her, you would do anything to stay with that person, but from my point of view, people only feel that the first two months, then they come back to reality and think about real important things in life.
I would never abdicate for love if I were queen, because being a queen is a very important responsibility, but I have never been queen and I have never fallen in love so much, so… Who knows? People do crazy things for love…
Women there are many in the world, who you fall in love with truth, because your can you believe that these lover but actually not. To be in love with a person you need years of relationship and see you need it next. I not abdicated King because King is something very important, it is true that the Kings choose not anyone, but in my opinion there are Queens and princesses very beautiful that a King can marry. A King must know how to separate their personal lives and their loves from his function as King because although it is difficult, it needs to do.
ResponderEliminarFirstly, should abdicate because supposedly love left everything that happens that this is something more , something that happens to a person of normal street, so here it is difficult, I think to make that decision you have to be pretty sure that love is real and forever you will never fail, is not an easy decision to make as it is to give up a very important privilege , first I would seem a sign of love but we must also take into account risk that can run, nothing in life ensures that a fence last love and everything you let in love is nice and is fine but you have to think hard and try to make the best decision because in this life above all have to think in yourself and what is best for you.
ResponderEliminarSo I think this decision is not easy and has its good and bad parts and is a decision you have to take it slow and shuffling all things very calmly and as I said before thinking of yourself.
I would have to think a lot and I am more than sure it's the woman of my life but would leave or not leave the throne. is a big step and you can not take so lightly, we must meditate and talk to your parents or close relatives. I would suspect the woman at the beginning and more knowing his history, divorced twice ... something that was unthinkable in those days before what God has joined no man put asunder. donot really what I'd do.
ResponderEliminarif I'm really in love and she is also what I would leave, do not leave the throne to my country but also the country would have to understand. would not fail to take my fancy and my possessions, but would have to accept that I am no longer king.
this is my opinion, there may be people who do not agree but if you really piensop worth must fight for what you want. Alejandro Kirkendall
If I were completely, honestly and wholeheartedly in love, then yes, I would abdicate for love if I were a King. I am a romantic and believe that love conquers all. Look at Prince Carlos he finally got married to his Camilla and although our Prince Felipe didn´t have to abdicate his title neither, he got married to Leticia who does not belong to the nobility because he fell in love with her. If I were King I would not only fight for my title but also for the love of my life. I think that today the society is more tolerant, and would be easier
ResponderEliminarToday if King could marry anyone but if she could not live in those times because the truth that if one part and the other not abdicate. If I really fall in love if you abdicate but could not bear the idea that he could be king and I'm not in love and I have therefore given up my great power but the fact that it would be wrong not to abdicate because you would not have the responsibilities of a king and could live placid and quietly without having the responsibilities of a king.
ResponderEliminarLUIS BECA MORILLO 1-C
If I were a king, with my palace, with all my servants, and my huge crown, I think I would have all girls in the world “in love” of mine… I say “in love” because I don´t know if they would feel real love or they want me because “she” is going to sleep in a huge bed with a huge headboard, the servants would carry the breakfast to the bed… Or because they would live like queens!
ResponderEliminarBut, in the case that anyone make me happy, I think I would abdicate if the girl of my life, a girl who understands me, who laughing with me and very nice it would be out of my kingdom, because love costs more of the fame, the money and the POWER… I would abdicate for the girl of my dreams only if I know that she it is.
The truth that it's a rare and difficult subject to find in real life. But if I put myself in that situation would think well, if I were queen and was in love with a person much ... I abdicate. Because for my forever love and happiness are above all, above money, above fame ... But if on the other hand love the other person is not as great as that of being queen would follow reign and I would ensure to be clear.
ResponderEliminarIt is very interesting that a woman has done that for love because love is now no longer so important and couples are separated and there is no respect that existed before.
This is a difficult question. If you are born into a royal family then you are educated in such a way as to know you have responsibilities and cannot always do what you would like to but there is always a possibility of renouncing your duty. I think you would have to be very much in love and very sure of your decisions to abdicate for love. It is very important because once you have made the decision you cannot change your mind and be a prince or princess again.
ResponderEliminarNo one can choose what sort of family they are born into but we can choose who we marry and what we do with our lives, at least nowadays and in most but not all countries. It is important to be happy and to be with the people you love, apart from fulfilling obligations and responsibilities but this is a very difficult choice for people who are born into a royal family. If I were a queen and in love with someone I couldn´t marry I would abdicate but these days that not everybody gets married maybe I could still be queen and not lose the man I love, but not have to marry anybody else.
This is an issue that can not talk too much about my ideas about love are quite bad and I guess would be a resounding no, but who knows.The supposed "better half", you usually do not know, because the world is very large and does not have to live in your own country
ResponderEliminarwe usually resign themselves to people who appreciate us and show us affection, but as time passes, that is lost until only the memory of what once was is nice. No, as it has not been clear I do not believe in love, and would not give such an important position for an illusion that will not last long.
but of course, that if he found that special someone, I would give anything to be with him.
To be honest, I do not know what I would do it. I guess I would balance between the advantages and disadvantages of take a decision as such.
ResponderEliminarCertainly, after read the biography of Wallis Simpson where is says that at the end they live a leisure life it does not seem so bad abdicate.
If you are a king, you have duties that you would not have if you have abdicated, so finally can have a good life with the woman you loves without cares.
Anyway, to be king has to be an unique and cool experience and the world is full of womens who has not ever been married among what I can choose!
I don’t know if I would abdicate for love if I were king. I think that if a man is in love and he loves very much a woman, he has to be with her. And if she is divorced it doesn’t matter. If I were a king, I suppose I will have a lot of different duties, it is a job. People should not worry about the life of the others. If a king wants to marry a woman he loves, it is all right.
ResponderEliminarBut on the other hand, a king has a lot of responsabilities and he has to think about them.
in my view if I were a queen I am sure that I would abdicate for love.
ResponderEliminarOn the one hand, I think that fall in love it is impossible to reject because you can't decide about your feelings. So in my opinion you are happier with the person who you love than having a life with authority.
But on the other hand it would be a difficult decission. You would lost a lot of advantages and many people would hate you. Furthermore you don't have so money than if you would continue being a queen.
in short if I fall in love, I would leave everything for love.
SUSANA CARO FERRAND 1ºD
The story of Wallis Simpson and Edward VIII is so exceptional that eighty years after she was still talking and still making movies about that time in history as it appears in the film The King's Speech giving him the oscar for about three years if I limit myself to abdicate, ie stop being king, nor I approach it, but if history is to give up for the sake of something very important if it can happen to anyone, as it can be work, family, inheritance etc.. I do not know what I would do, the body calls me to say he would resign because love is the most important at the time but now who knows?
ResponderEliminarI would not leave in my life the throne of the king for love because this love can that it you lasts little time and not to manage to be real, for which you lose the throne for a love of a moment. You to risk having almost your entire life solved by a love that can that it destroys it in nothing of time. Because of it it is better to stop to think in what you are going to do that to do and later to repent in nothing of time in the dung that awfully for a love that can that it goes out for you well or not.
ResponderEliminar